🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."