🔗 Share this article

For a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the World Series did not happen during the tense finale on Saturday, when her squad executed one dramatic comeback feat after another and then winning in extra innings against the Toronto Blue Jays.

It came a game earlier, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a thrilling, decisive sequence that simultaneously upended many harmful stereotypes promoted about Hispanic people in the past decades.

The play itself was stunning: Hernández charged in from left field to catch a ball he at first lost in the stadium lights, then fired it to second base to secure another, decisive out. the second baseman, at second base, received the ball moments before a runner barreled into him, knocking him backwards.

This wasn't merely a remarkable athletic achievement, perhaps the key turn in the series in the Dodgers' direction after looking for much of the series like the weaker team. To her, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a much-required uplift for the community and for Los Angeles after a period of immigration raids, security forces patrolling the neighborhoods, and a constant stream of negativity from national leaders.

"Kike and Miggy put forth this counter-narrative," said the professor. "The world saw Latinos displaying an contagious pride and joy in what they do, being key figures on the team, having a different kind of masculinity. They are bombastic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It's so easy to be disheartened these days."

However, it's exactly straightforward to be a team fan nowadays – for Molina or for the legions of other fans who show up regularly to matches and fill up as many as half of the stadium's 50,000 spots each time.

The Mixed Relationship with the Organization

When aggressive enforcement operations began in Los Angeles in early June, and military troops were sent into the city to react to resulting demonstrations, two of the local soccer clubs quickly released statements of support with immigrant families – but not the Dodgers.

Management has said the organization prefer to steer clear of political issues – a view colored, perhaps, by the fact that a significant minority of the supporters, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain leaders. After considerable public pressure, the team later pledged $one million in support for families directly impacted by the operations but issued no official condemnation of the administration.

Official Event and Historical Legacy

Three months earlier, the team did not hesitate in accepting an offer to celebrate their 2024 championship win at the official residence – a decision that sports columnists labeled as "disappointing … spineless … and contradictory", given the team's pride in having been the first professional franchise to end the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that history and the principles it embodies by executives and current and former athletes. Several team members such as the coach had voiced unwillingness to travel to the White House during the initial period but either changed their minds or gave in to demands from the organization.

Business Control and Supporter Conflicts

An additional issue for fans is that the team are controlled by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose investments, as per media reports and its own published financial documents, include a share in a detention corporation that runs detention centers. The group's leadership has stated many times that it aims to remain neutral of political matters, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own form of acquiescence to certain agendas.

These factors add up to considerable conflicted emotions among Latino fans in especial – feelings that emerged even in the excitement of this year's hard-fought World Series triumph and the following outpouring of team support across the city.

"Is it okay to root for the team?" local columnist one observer reflected at the beginning of the postseason in an elegant article pondering on "team loyalty in our blood, but doubt in our minds". Galindo was unable to finally bring himself to view the World Series, but he still cared strongly, to the point that he decided his one-man boycott must have brought the team the fortune it needed to succeed.

Separating the Players from the Owners

Numerous fans who have similar reservations appear to have concluded that they can keep to back the team and its roster of international players, including the Japanese superstar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's business leadership. At no place was this more evident than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the capacity crowd cheered in support of the coach and his athletes but jeered the team president and the chief executive of the ownership group.

"These men in formal attire do not get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the Dodgers for more time than they have."

Historical Context and Neighborhood Effect

The problem, however, goes further than only the organization's present proprietors. The agreement that brought the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s involved the city demolishing three working-class Hispanic communities on a elevated area overlooking downtown and then selling the land to the team for a fraction of its actual worth. A song on a 2005 album that documents the story has an low-income parking attendant at the venue stating that the house he lost to eviction is now third base.

A prominent commentator, perhaps the region's most widely followed Latino writer and media personality, sees a darker side to the long, problematic relationship between the team and its audience. He describes the team the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a corporate entity with an undue, even harmful following by numerous Latinos" that has been shortchanging its supporters for years.

"They have acted around Latino followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to get away with it," Arellano wrote over the warmer months, when calls to avoid the organization over its absence of reaction to the enforcement actions were upended by the uncomfortable fact that attendance at home games did not dip, even at the height of the protests when downtown LA was subject to a evening curfew.

Global Stars and Community Bonds

Distinguishing the squad from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {